|
The 1844 Whig National Convention was held in Baltimore, Maryland to nominate the Whig Party's candidates for President and Vice President. Ambrose Spencer was Chairman. President John Tyler had been expelled from the party and the delegates searched for a new nominee. They did not have to look far; the delegates nominated party elder Henry Clay of Kentucky for President, by acclamation.〔 Theodore Frelinghuysen of New Jersey was nominated for Vice President. The pair would lose to Democrats James Polk and George M. Dallas.〔 Senator Henry Clay of Kentucky, effectively the leader of the Whig Party since its inception in 1834〔Holt, 2005, p. 10: "Clay had engineered the formation of the Whig Party in 1834..."〕 was selected as the Whig presidential nominee at the party's convention in Baltimore, Maryland on May 1, 1844.〔Wilentz, 2008, p. 569: The Whig convention "unanimously approved Clay's nomination"..."a thoroughly joyous and exciting affair."〕〔Wilentz, 2008 ,p. 569: The Whig convention (1844 ) in Baltimore, which assembled on May 1..."〕 Clay, a slaveholder, presided over a party in which its Southern wing was sufficiently committed to the national platform to put partisan loyalties above slavery expansionist proposals that might undermine its North-South alliance.〔Finkelman. 2011, p. 18: "In Congress, the Whigs had blocked Texas annexation, with southern Whigs joining their northern colleagues...who opposed Texas annexation because of slavery."〕〔Wilentz, 2008, p. 569: The Whig platform "did not even mention Texas..."〕 Whigs felt confident that Clay could duplicate Harrison's landslide victory of 1840 against any opposition candidate.〔Finkelmn, 2011, p. 21: Whigs regarded the election as a "cakewalk", believing Clay would swamp Polk.〕〔Freehling, 1991, p. 360:"...Southern Whigs used the same electioneering hoopla in 1844..." as in 1840.〕 Southern Whigs feared that, with the acquisition of Texas' fertile lands would produce a huge market for slave labor, inflating the price of slaves and deflating land values in their home states.〔Finkelman. 2011, p. 18: "In the South, Whigs argued that annexation would harm slavery because a large migration to Texas would raise the price of slaves and lower price of land in the rest of the South."〕 Northern Whigs feared that Texas statehood would initiate the opening of a vast "Empire for Slavery".〔Finkelman. 2011, p. 18: "Northern Whigs, joined by some northern Democrats, saw Texas as a great "Empire for Slavery".〕 Two weeks before the Whig convention in Baltimore, in reaction to Calhoun's Packenham Letter, Clay issued a document known as the Raleigh Letter (issued April 17, 1844)〔Freeling, 1991, p. 427: The "so-called Raleigh letter of April 17, 1844."〕 presenting his views on Texas to his fellow southern Whigs.〔Holt, 2005, p 10: Clay declared Texas annexation "fraught with danger to the nation" and would "erode national comity" and "produce a war with Mexico."〕 In it, he flatly denounced the Tyler annexation bill and predicted that its passage would provoke a war with Mexico, whose government had never recognized Texas independence.〔Freehling, 1991, p. 427: "While Clay concurred with Van Buren on opposing the Calhoun-Tyler () treaty, the two opponents differed on post-treaty annexation policy." Finkelman, 2011, p. 26: "When the 1844 campaign began, Henry Clay was unalterably opposed to annexation."〕 Clay underlined his position, warning that even with Mexico's consent, he would block annexation in the event that substantial sectional opposition existed anywhere in the United States.〔Freehling, 1991, p. 427: "Clay...would halt annexation unless Mexico assented. He would also deny Texas entrance in the Union, no matter whether Mexico agreed, should 'a considerable and respectable portion' of the American people "express 'decided opposition'"〕 The Whig party leadership was acutely aware that any proslavery legislation advanced by its southern wing would alienate its anti-slavery northern wing and cripple the party in the general election.〔Freehling, 1991, p. 426-427: "Southern Whigs thus had to weigh the possibility that Texas might be abolitionized (Great Britain ) against the certainty that campaigning for () annexation would split their party."〕 In order to preserve their party, Whigs would need to stand squarely against acquiring a new slave state. As such, Whigs were content to restrict their 1844 campaign platform to less divisive issues such as internal improvements and national finance.〔Wilentz, 2008, p. 568-569: "The Texas issue struck () as a giant distraction from the real issues...internal improvements, the tariff and the rest of the American System..." and "ratified a four-part unity platform" based on the "American System."〕〔Freehling, 1991, p. 353, p. 355, p. 436〕〔Finkelman. 2011, p. 22: "The Whigs wanted to talk about the tariff and currency, which were no longer exciting issues."〕 Whigs picked Theodore Frelinghuysen of New Jersey – "the Christian Statesman" – as Clay's running mate. An advocate of colonization of emancipated slaves, he was acceptable to southern Whigs as an opponent of the abolitionists.〔Finkelman, 2008, p. 21: "...as an avid colonizationist () conservative views on slavery made him acceptable to southerners, and at the convention, almost all southern delegates voted for him." And p. 19-20: "...he was clearly an opponest of the abolitionists."〕 His pious reputation balanced Clay's image as a slave-holding, hard-drinking duelist.〔Finkelman. 2011, p. 17, p. 21: Freylinghuysen "the perfect northerner to balance the somewhat sordid reputation of the slaveowning, dueling, hard-drinking Clay."〕〔Wilentz, 2008, p. 569: Freylinghuysen served to "offset Clay's reputation for moral laxity..."〕 Their party slogan was the bland "Hurray, Hurray, the Country's Risin' – Vote for Clay and Frelinghuysen!"〔Finkelman. 2011, p. 22: The "less than snappy slogan..."〕 ==The Balloting== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「1844 Whig National Convention」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|